{"name":"TrendyVest Corrections Register","url":"https://www.trendyvest.com/corrections","dateModified":"2026-09-27","coverage":"Includes the supplied Decoy Chronicle and Whisper Register correction histories, subsequent register updates and published article updates recorded through the corrections editor. A complete historical newsroom corrections inventory has not yet been supplied; this is not a claim that no other corrections exist.","suppliedHistory":["The count was published as 94 on 15 September. It is 92. The revised edition of that evening's recap re-counted two entries already logged in its first edition. Tracing the increments: 68 at the start, 79 after the Midday of 14 September, 85 after the Closing Edge, 89 and then 90 across the two editions of the 15 September Brief, 92 after the Recap, 96 after the first Errata. A register that logs other people's arithmetic has to survive its own.","16 September. Entry 94 is withdrawn: a headline giving the day's high beside a table giving the current level is not a contradiction, and Tuesday's intraday peak was 5.04 percent on three feeds, not the 5.02 this desk swore in. The count falls to 95, rises to 96 with entry 97, to 97 with entry 98 at midday, to 98 with entry 99 after the Fed Day piece's fact-check, and to 99 with entry 100 in the Closing Edge. The withdrawn entry stays on the page, numbered and marked, and is not counted.","16 September, evening. The Errata, No. 1, said the Summary of Economic Projections publishes nineteen individual projections. It publishes eighteen: there are nineteen participants and Chair Warsh does not submit one, as he said in June. The forecast built on that count (item 8 of No. 1) is scored on its other two forms. Corrected at full size at the top of No. 2. The count rises from 99 to 104 with entries 101 to 105.","18 September, midday. The Whisper, No. 2, was written against a count of 111, read from this page before the day's later entries were posted, and its sources section carries that figure. The page is right and the issue is behind it: the count stood at 115 when No. 2 went out and rises to 116 with entry 117 below. The issue was corrected before delivery; the discrepancy is recorded here because the register is the authority on its own arithmetic.","17 September. The Whisper, No. 1, said this register stood at 104. It stood at 106: the morning's Brief had logged entries 106 and 107 before The Whisper was written, and the desk carried a stale count into print. Corrected at full size at the top of the Closing Edge, which was built after Thursday's close and published on Friday, after the Friday Brief had added entries 108 to 112; its four entries are therefore numbered 113 to 116 and the count rises from 111 to 115.","22 September, morning. The Errata, No. 3, is Monday's issue and was delivered Tuesday morning: the scheduled Monday-evening run stalled after reading the runbook and resumed at 9:21 a.m. Tuesday, so its observations are stamped Tuesday between 9:21 and 9:57 a.m. It was drafted against a count of 120; the Tuesday Brief logged entries 122 and 123 while it was being built, and its first entry is the same page as entry 122, so it adds six, not seven. The page is right: the count stood at 122 when No. 3 went to press and rises to 128 with entries 124 to 129. No Errata ran on Thursday 17 or Friday 18 September; No. 2's forecast is scored in No. 3, four days late.","22 September, evening. The Errata, No. 3, said Tuesday's two-year auction was $78 billion. It was $69 billion, the same size as every two-year auction this year, per investingLive, Newsquawk and Helious. The figure sat in the forecast register (item 3 of No. 3) and in entry 128; both are corrected in place and the correction runs at full size at the top of No. 4. Separately, No. 3 printed November WTI's Monday settlement at $92.47 from Reuters; Tuesday's changes on Yahoo Finance and Avalon Capital both imply $92.37, and the ten cents is left unresolved until the exchange settlement can be read. No. 4 was delivered late: its run stalled between reads, and its observations are stamped to windows between 7:22 and 9:05 p.m. rather than to minutes. The count rises from 128 to 133 with entries 130 to 134.","23 September, morning. The Brief logged entries 135 and 136 and the count rises from 133 to 135. The Brief also notes that the flash PMI figures printed as consensus in No. 4's forecast (manufacturing 53.9, composite 56) are the August priors on Trading Economics; Investing.com's consensus is 53.6 for manufacturing and 55.8 for services, with none for the composite. Recorded here for tonight's scoring.","24 September, morning. The Brief logged entries 137 to 139 and the count rises from 135 to 138. The Brief was delivered after its 8:15 a.m. target; its observations are stamped between 8:58 and 9:05 a.m. rather than to the earlier window. A second edition, fact-checked between 9:10 and 9:20 a.m., corrects three of the desk's own errors at full size: August new home sales and the Kansas City Fed survey were printed with their Trading Economics priors (607,000 and 10) as consensus, the same failure logged against The Errata, No. 4; Muse was said to have been unveiled at Meta's Connect conference with no fee disclosed, when it was announced on 8 September and carries $20 and $100 monthly tiers, the transaction fee being what is undisclosed; and McDonald's fall was attributed to remarks on traffic without the $8.5 billion franchisee plan the market was pricing. The count is unchanged at 138.","24 September, evening. The Errata, No. 5, scores No. 4 a day late: no Errata ran on Wednesday 23 September. No. 4’s forecast item 3 carried the August flash PMI readings (53.9, 56) as consensus, as the Wednesday Brief recorded above; corrected at full size at the top of No. 5. No. 5 was delivered after its 8:15 p.m. target, with observations stamped between 8:21 and 8:25 p.m. The count rises from 138 to 143 with entries 140 to 144. A fact-check after delivery found that No. 5 had read a Yahoo Finance update's UTC page stamp as Eastern and printed 2:27 p.m. for 10:27 a.m.; corrected in entries 143 and 144, in the issue's second edition, its figure and its thread. The finding is unchanged.","25 September, morning. The Brief logged entries 145 to 147 and the count rises from 143 to 146. The Brief was delivered after its 8:15 a.m. target: the run stalled between reads, its observations are stamped between 7:20 and 7:40 a.m., and the 8:30 durable goods release is previewed in it, not reported.","25 September, midday. The Whisper, No. 8, adds entry 148 and the count rises from 146 to 147. The issue was delivered after its 12:30 p.m. slot, with observations stamped between 11:10 a.m. and 12:20 p.m. Its entry is a headline that restates its own body as a different quantity, which is the failure mode of entries 108 and 143 in a new setting: a forecast threshold published as a forecast."],"whisperHistory":["When the desk gets a trail wrong — a sighting misdated, a tier misjudged, a status moved too early — the correction is recorded here, dated, and the entry is amended below with the change marked.","18 September. A note on a published number rather than a correction to one. The tally band's open tile counts every rumor that has not been settled by a document, which includes those at corroborated; it has read that way since this register was built and it is left reading that way.","19 September. Two issues were published for Friday. The desk's scheduled run posted No. 2 on Friday afternoon, adding entries 3 and 4. A second issue, reported on Friday afternoon while that run was still working and published on Saturday, is numbered No. 3 and adds entries 5, 6 and 7. Neither issue restates the other and no entry has been renumbered. With seven rumors tracked and one confirmed, open is six and the median lag of resolved rumors is zero.","21 September — entry 3 amended. The Whisper, No. 2, reported that no mainstream American outlet had carried the AMD price-increase claim as of 12:44 p.m. on Friday 18 September, and left entry 3's lag running. It had. The 5:22 a.m. Friday relay that No. 2 logged as a Stocktwits item was published on Yahoo Finance's markets pages, under the headline \"AMD Stock Rises Premarket: Report Flags Chip Price Hike Linked To TSMC Costs,\" and Yahoo Finance is one of the outlets this desk uses to mark the end of a lag. The desk read the item and misfiled its publisher. That line is re-tiered and marked as the first mainstream US headline below, and entry 3's lag is corrected from running to one trading day. Corrected at full size at the top of The Whisper, No. 4.","21 September — entry 3's first sighting re-stamped. The Whisper, No. 2, stamped Wccftech's piece at 12:26 p.m. Eastern on 17 September. That is the UTC time carried in the page's metadata. The article's own byline reads \"Sarfraz Khan · Sep 17, 2026 at 08:26am EDT,\" and the correct stamp is 8:26 a.m. Eastern, sixty-four minutes before that session's open. The trail below is amended. The lag is unaffected at one trading day, but No. 2's argument that AMD's advance \"began in the premarket, hours before the report existed\" rested on the wrong time and is withdrawn: AMD opened that morning at 533.60 against 512.50, a gap of 4.12 percent on two feeds. Where the stock traded before 8:26 the desk cannot establish, and it no longer claims the move came first.","21 September — entries 4 and 7 corrected: SK hynix is US-listed. Both entries stated that no US-listed security exists for SK hynix, and the 21 September note that first appeared here treated the question as open. It is not. SK hynix Inc. American Depositary Shares have traded on Nasdaq as SKHY since 10 July 2026, on a Form F-1 filed 24 June and amended 30 June and 6 July (CIK 0002120882, file 333-296987); Nasdaq's own security page carries the line, and the older OTC line HXSCL is a separate security whose prices will not reconcile with it. Benzinga's ticker was right and this register was wrong. Both tape lines are amended. No figure published here depended on the error, because no reading was ever sworn in for either entry — which is how it survived three issues.","22 September — entry 2 amended: a company statement this register had missed. Entry 2's trail ran from Bloomberg's 14 September report to two desk checks that found no Form F-1, and recorded no company response. There was one. On 15 September, the day after the report, Kioxia published a \"Notice Regarding Certain Media Reports\" stating that such reports \"are not announcements made by the Company\" and that \"details of the listing such as the schedule, listing market, and listing method have not yet been decided.\" That is a tier-1 document and it sat unlogged through Nos. 2, 3 and 4. It is added to the trail below. It does not move the status: it confirms that a listing preparation exists, which the company itself disclosed in May, and declines to adopt the size, the exchange, the timing or the banks — which is what the claim as printed was about. Recorded at full size in The Whisper, No. 5.","23 September — a note on the run, not a correction. The Whisper, No. 6, was delivered after its 12:30 p.m. slot: the sweep ran long and the issue's last observations are stamped between 1:13 and 1:19 p.m. rather than before the hour. Its figures and its lag counts are stamped to those minutes and are accurate to them. No entry below is amended by this issue; entry 9 is added and entries 1, 3, 5 and 6 have a 23 September desk check appended, with the lags on 5 and 6 advanced by one session each.","24 September — entry 2 corrected: a Form F-6 this register said did not exist, and a second facility besides. Entry 2's desk check of 22 September reported \"still no Form F-1 or F-6 for Kioxia.\" The F-1 half holds; the F-6 half does not. A Form F-6EF sits on EDGAR under accession 0001019155-26-000048, filed 11 February 2026, registering 50,000,000 American depositary shares over Kioxia common stock and naming no exchange. Kioxia did not file it: it is signed by The Bank of New York Mellon, as Depositary, and Kioxia Holdings Corporation appears in it only as \"the issuer of deposited securities,\" neither registrant nor signatory. Nor is it the facility that trades: the over-the-counter line KXIAY is a separate unsponsored programme with J.P. Morgan as depositary, announced 9 March 2026, ratio 10:1, CUSIP 49726J108. Two depositary banks have built receipts over Kioxia's shares and the company signed neither, which is why the status does not move: an unsponsored facility is a bank's decision and an F-6 registers receipts, not an offering. The claim tracked here — size, banks, an exchange — still needs an F-1 and an exchange application, and neither exists. The trail below is amended. The desk kept running the EDGAR search that returns SK hynix, the trap it had itself recorded on 22 September, and concluded from it that nothing was there. Corrected at full size at the top of The Whisper, No. 7.","24 September — a note on the run, not a correction. The Whisper, No. 7, was delivered after its 12:30 p.m. slot: the sweep ran long and the issue's observations are stamped between 11:11 a.m. and 1:41 p.m. rather than before the hour, and are accurate to those minutes. Entry 10 is added and entries 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 9 have a 24 September desk check appended, with the lags on 5, 6 and 9","25 September — a note on the run, not a correction. The Whisper, No. 8, was delivered after its 12:30 p.m. slot; its observations are stamped between 11:10 a.m. and 12:20 p.m. and are accurate to those minutes. The desk’s principal asked mid-run that the sweep be widened beyond the AI supply chain to technology, biotechnology and financials; it was, and nothing outside the usual beat cleared the floor, which is recorded in the issue’s “seen, not printed” counts. Entry 11 is added and entries 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 have a 25 September desk check appended, with the lags on 5, 6, 9 and 10 advanced by one session each."],"whisperSourceNotes":["This is the owner-supplied register as of 25 September 2026, not a fresh verification of the claims or market observations. Publication does not independently establish that a rumor is true.","The supplied 24 September run note ends mid-sentence after “with the lags on 5, 6 and 9”. It is preserved as supplied; the missing remainder has not been reconstructed.","The source names outlets, documents and domains but supplies no direct citation URLs. Citation lists are therefore empty. No article, filing or document URL has been inferred from a name or an accession number.","The open tally includes both open and corroborated entries. The open status filter is narrower: it selects only entries whose status is open.","The supplied tally reports a median lag of 0 days. A first-sighting-to-mainstream-headline median cannot be derived reliably: entry 7 has an undated first sighting and its zero measures document-to-wire time instead. The derived median is therefore unavailable; the reported figure is retained separately.","Trail order and date labels are preserved as supplied, including the 24 September check before the 23 September check in entry 1. No missing observation time, date or year has been inferred."],"corrections":[{"id":"correction-1","date":"2026-09-27","note":"Removed the unsupported claim that the quoted magnitude was right. The supplied level of 157.871 and increase of 1.2965 imply a prior level of 156.5745 and approximately 0.828 percent, not 1.22 percent. This arithmetic does not independently establish the observed market move.","entryIds":[111],"previousCorrectByEntry":{"111":"A rising dollar-yen is a weaker yen. The pair rose after the Bank of Japan's increase to 1.25 percent; Invezz had the yen weakening toward 157 at 1:28 a.m. The magnitude was right and the direction was inverted."},"source":"https://www.trendyvest.com/decoy-chronicle","sourceTitle":"The Decoy Chronicle"},{"id":"correction-2","date":"2026-09-27","note":"Corrected the equation: 52,064 + 316 = 52,380. Dividing 316 by 0.0060 yields approximately 52,666.67, not 52,380. A displayed percentage may be rounded and does not reconstruct an exact prior close.","entryIds":[115],"previousCorrectByEntry":{"115":"A quote equal to its own previous close cannot carry a change of 316 points; 316 ÷ 0.0060 implies a base near 52,380, which the page does not show. The range contains neither Wednesday's close of 51,461.90 nor Thursday's of 51,778.04 (Google Finance; +316 points also per Trading Economics). The same page carried Wednesday's close correctly at 4:11 p.m. and an older session eleven minutes later."},"source":"https://www.trendyvest.com/decoy-chronicle","sourceTitle":"The Decoy Chronicle"},{"id":"correction-3","date":"2026-09-27","note":"Removed the invalid assertion that identical benchmark prices with unequal percentage changes cannot both be correct. A Monday comparison does not establish Friday settlements. The entry is retained with source verification pending; no contemporaneous same-contract settlement evidence or new outcome has been supplied.","entryIds":[118],"previousCorrectByEntry":{"118":"Brent trades above WTI, and did all week: this morning the pair was $101.91 against $98.54, a spread of $3.37 on one page at one minute (Trading Economics, 6:40 a.m.). Identical levels with unequal percentage changes cannot both be right in any case, and $100.70 is also the same table's Thursday WTI level."},"source":"https://www.trendyvest.com/decoy-chronicle","sourceTitle":"The Decoy Chronicle"}]}